| Portland Monthly
Magazine-Urban Brawl, Water Fluoridation
| Against
Fluoridation
"Doesn't the public deserve to
know that no one can produce a study regarding what
fluoride does in the human body?" -Lynn Campbell |
For
Fluoridation
"You have no right
to deprive the public from the benefits of fluoride
in water" -Michael Meredith |
- Medication without consent
- Not FDA approved
- Safety standards set by manufacturers
- Supporting data inconclusive
- Brushing works just as well
|
- Used with proven results,
since 1962
- Reduces childhood tooth decay
by 50%
- Easier to administer in kids
- Cost-effective treatment
- Safer than toothpaste
|
The Following letter was partially printed
in the August 2004 edition of Portland
Monthly magazine.
Dental
Gloss
The “Urban Brawl” topic for June/July
is about the pros and cons of fluoridating water. There are
arguments that Oregonian children have a high rate of cavities,
but why do they have cavities? It is not from a fluoride deficiency
or from brushing their teeth the wrong way. It is because
they are unhealthy. Lets look this horse in the mouth!
In the 1930’s Dr. Weston A. Price,
a dentist, visited isolated non-industrialized indigenous
cultures around the world to find out why they had good teeth
and people living in the civilized world did not. It was because
of what they ate. , Dr. Price's research showed that humans
achieve perfect physical form and perfect health generation
after generation only when they eat nutrient-dense whole foods,
vital fat-soluble activators found exclusively in animal fats
and stayed away from modern processed foods and sweets. We
already know that there is an obesity problem here in Oregon
and this is the same reason that there is a tooth decay problem
here too. Let’s confront the root of the problem here
instead of finding a quick fix it that will only lead to disaster
in these children’s future. If we don’t stop children
from eating sweets and junk foods then we will never change
the fact that America is an unhealthy nation.
Yes, there are studies that show fluoridation
reduces cavities but there are also studies that show it does
not. The largest study ever done on tooth decay (by the National
Institute of Dental Research in 1987) showed that there was
no significant difference in the teeth of children drinking
partially fluoridated and non-fluoridated water in 84 cities.
Other studies show that fluoride does not stop tooth decay
but just delays the maturation of children’s teeth.
Eventually they will have tooth decay.
Beyond the tooth decay issue, there is also
information that fluoridated water can cause harm to our children.
Silicofluorides, the fluoride that is added to our water is
a non-biodegradable, hazardous waste product of big industry
which also comes with lead, arsenic and other toxins. If these
chemicals are not dumped in the public water supplies, they
would have to be neutralized at the highest rated hazardous
waste facility at a cost of $1.40 per gallon (or more depending
on how much cadmium, lead, uranium and arsenic are also present).
In 1997, EPA scientist, J. William Hirzy,
PhD, stated, “Our members’ review of the body
of evidence over the last eleven years, including animal and
human epidemiological studies, indicate a causal link between
fluoride/fluoridation and cancer, genetic damage, neurological
impairment and bone pathology. Of particular concern are recent
epidemiological studies linking fluoride exposure to lowered
IQ in children.”
Should we start pouring chemicals into our
water supply that are not FDA approved and might not live
up to their purpose? Will we be creating a more toxic world
than we already live in? I feel that our ignorance and the
wrong doings of big business have already caused us enough
challenges.
Robert Ciprian, DC
|